US DOJ finds widespread racial bias by Ferguson police force

admin tbngqbwjfcgd , , , , , , , , , , ,

first_imgWASHINGTON — Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson was justified in shooting Michael Brown, an unarmed black 18-year-old, in August because he feared for his life after Brown first tried to grab his gun and then came toward him in a threatening manner, according to a U.S. Justice Department report released Wednesday.“Given that Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses . . . there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat,” officials concluded in the 87-page report. The review explained why the Justice Department will not pursue civil rights charges against Wilson for the fatal shooting.A second scathing 102-page report, also released Wednesday, highlighted widespread racial bias by the 72-member Ferguson police department and described a system of using law enforcement to extract money from African American residents, a practice Attorney General Eric Holder called “revenue generation through policing.”The investigation found that Ferguson officers competed to see who could issue the largest number of citations during a single stop, and in one instance, that total rose to 14. Even minor code violations sometimes resulted in multiple arrests, jail time and payments that far exceeded the cost of the original ticket. The Justice Department investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. Washington Post graphic“Seen in this context, amid a highly toxic environment, defined by mistrust and resentment, stoked by years of bad feelings and spurred by illegal and misguided practices, it is not difficult to imagine how a single tragic incident set off the city of Ferguson like a powder keg,” Holder said Wednesday, in one of his last speeches before he steps down.Justice officials personally met with Brown’s parents Wednesday morning to notify them of the department’s findings.“Today we received disappointing news from the Department of Justice that the killer of our son wouldn’t be held accountable for his actions,” Lesley McSpadden and Michael Brown Sr. said in a statement. “While we are saddened by this decision, we are encouraged that the DOJ will hold the Ferguson Police Department accountable for the pattern of racial bias and profiling they found in their handling of interactions with people of color.”Justice Department officials said they would have had to prove that Wilson used unreasonable force against Brown and that he did so “willfully,” knowing that it was against the law to do so. Instead, after a seven-month review, investigators found that Wilson’s shooting of Brown did “not constitute a prosecutable violation.”A grand jury in St. Louis had declined to indict Wilson in November.Justice Department investigators came to their conclusion after canvassing more than 300 homes and reviewing physical, ballistic, forensic, medical and crime-scene evidence. They also examined Wilson’s personnel records, audio and video recordings and the transcripts from the proceedings before the St. Louis County grand jury.“The promise I made when I went to Ferguson and at the time that we launched our investigation was not that we would arrive at a particular outcome, but rather that we would pursue the facts, wherever they led,” Holder said.Holder said he understood why some would wonder how the department’s findings could differ so sharply from the initial accounts of what happened in Ferguson. But he said the discrepancy was due, in part, to a deeply rooted pattern of racial bias in the police department that had left the Ferguson community polarized.“A community where both policing and municipal court practices were found to disproportionately harm African-American residents,” Holder said.Justice officials met with Ferguson city officials Tuesday, including the mayor and the police chief, to discuss their findings in what one Justice official called “a difficult conversation.” The Justice Department made 26 recommendations for the Ferguson police department and municipal court, including a “robust system of true community policing” and new hiring practices to recruit minority officers.“It is time for Ferguson’s leaders to take immediate, wholesale and structural corrective action,” Holder said. “Let me be clear: The United States Department of Justice reserves all its rights and abilities to force compliance and implement basic change.”The majority of law enforcement agencies that have been investigated by the department’s civil rights division have entered into voluntary agreements to implement recommended changes. But if that doesn’t happen, the department can bring a lawsuit, as it has done against several cities.Ferguson Mayor James Knowles, a Republican, said at a news conference Wednesday night that his police department is determined to address racial discrimination charges. “We must do better, not only as a city, but as a state and a country,” he said.Justice officials also released seven racist emails written by Ferguson police and municipal court officials that they said indicated “intentional discrimination.”A November 2008 email, for instance, stated that President Barack Obama could not be president for very long because “what black man holds a steady job for four years.” Another email described Obama as a chimpanzee. An email from 2011 showed a photo of a bare-chested group of dancing women apparently in Africa with the caption, “Michelle Obama’s High School Reunion.” Another joked that a black woman would help stop crime because she got an abortion.Justice officials did not specifically identify who wrote the emails and to whom they were sent but said they were written by police and court supervisors.Knowles said that three police supervisors who were found to have sent racist emails will be fully investigated and that one has already been fired.“Let me be clear, this type of behavior will not be tolerated in the Ferguson police department or in any department in the city of Ferguson,” Knowles said. “These actions taken by these individuals are in no way representative of the employees of the city of Ferguson.”In hundreds of interviews and in a wide-ranging review of more than 35,000 pages of police records and other documents, Justice Department officials found that although African-Americans make up 67 percent of the population in Ferguson, they accounted for 93 percent of all arrests between 2012 and 2014. The Ferguson police also overwhelmingly employed force against African-Americans, including the use of dogs in police actions.As part of its findings, the Justice Department concluded that African-Americans accounted for 85 percent of all drivers stopped by Ferguson police officers and 90 percent of all citations issued.In one case, a woman received two parking tickets that totaled $152. But she has paid $550 to date in fines and fees to the city . She has been arrested twice for having unpaid tickets, spent six days in jail and still owes Ferguson $541.In an example of what Holder called “routine” constitutional violations, a Ferguson officer arrested a 32-year-old African-American man who was sitting in his car resting after a basketball game. With no apparent justification, the officer accused the man of being a pedophile, wouldn’t let him use his phone and ordered him out of his car for a pat-down. When the man objected, the officer drew his gun, pointed it at the man’s head and arrested him on eight different counts.—–Washington Post staff writers Mark Berman and Wesley Lowery contributed to this report.(c) 2015, The Washington Post Facebook Comments Related posts:US Justice Department to launch probe of Ferguson police in wake of recent violence From ‘America’s Mayor’ to international security guru: Rudy Giuliani sends experts to El Salvador Talk of ‘Yankee imperialism’ rankles US Embassy in San José Migration is one of the most challenging issues of the 21st century, says UN officiallast_img

You May Also Like..

Asia’s shrinking glaciers protect large populations from drought stress

first_imgAbout 800 million people depend in part on meltwater from the thousands of glaciers in the high mountains of Asia. Water stress makes this region vulnerable to drought, but glaciers are a uniquely drought-resilient source of water. Here I show that seasonal glacier meltwater is equivalent to the basic needs of 221 ± 59 million people, or most of the annual municipal and industrial needs of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. During drought summers, meltwater dominates water inputs to the upper Indus, Aral and Chu/Issyk-Kul river basins. This reduces the risk of social instability, conflict and sudden migrations triggered by water scarcity, which is already associated with the large, rapidly growing populations and hydro-economies of these basins. Regional meltwater production is, however, unsustainably high—at 1.6 times the balance rate—and is expected to increase in future decades before ultimately declining. These results update and reinforce a previous publication in Nature on this topic, which was retracted after an inadvertent error was discovered.last_img

Majority of buyers benefit from progressive stamp duty

first_imgSome 71 per cent of homebuyers in England and Wales will benefit from changes to the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) announced in the Autumn Statement, according to Nationwide.Nationwide said that 86 per cent of purchases in London and the South East would profit from the Government’s decision to abolish the slab structure on Stamp Duty tax.Homebuyers in London are set to be the biggest beneficiary of the change due to the fact that home prices are generally higher and thus a higher proportion of transactions are liable for stamp duty.Overall, it is estimated that 98 per cent of buyers will pay the same or less tax under the new system in which purchasers pay the marginal tax rate on the relevant elements of the purchase price. According to 2013/14 data from the Land Registry, homebuyers in England and Wales would save an average of £1,600.In fact, according to the latest H M Revenue & Customs Tax Receipts statistics released in recent days, the Chancellor’s reform of the SDLT regime is already having an impact on tax receipts. The figures show that following the changes, SDLT receipts in January 2015 were down £299 million month-on-month, and down £126 million compared to a year earlier.Robert Pullen, Personal Tax Manager at London Chartered Accountants Blick Rothenberg LLP, commented, “In the Autumn statement on 3rd December, the Chancellor announced that from 4th December the amount of SDLT charged on a transaction was to be calculated on a progressive basis, rather than a ‘cliff-edge’ system. A person buying a house for £300,000 on 3rd December would pay SDLT of £9,000, whilst someone buying the same house at the same price on 4th December would pay SDLT of £5,000, a saving of £4,000.”However, Pullen added, “Of course not all people have been made better off by these changes, with those purchasing houses over £937,500 being worse off, so for those people, this could instead be considered the first pre-election tax increase and was definitely not a tax break.”Meanwhile, the January Transaction Data from Land Registry shows that it completed over 1,319,660 applications from its customers in January. This includes 1,278,536 applications by account customers, of which 335,489 were applications in respect of registered land (dealings); 595,723 were applications to obtain an official copy of a register or title plan; 162,298 were searches and 93,018 were transactions for value.progressive_stamp_duty sdlt stamp_duty_land_tax February 24, 2015The NegotiatorWhat’s your opinion? Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.Please note: This is a site for professional discussion. Comments will carry your full name and company.This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.Related articles 40% of tenants planning a move now that Covid has eased says Nationwide3rd May 2021 Letting agent fined £11,500 over unlicensed rent-to-rent HMO3rd May 2021 BREAKING: Evictions paperwork must now include ‘breathing space’ scheme details30th April 2021 Home » News » Majority of buyers benefit from progressive stamp duty previous nextRegulation & LawMajority of buyers benefit from progressive stamp dutyNew HM Revenue & Customs Tax Receipts statistics show that the Chancellor’s reform of the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is having an impact on tax receipts.PROPERTYdrum24th February 20150583 Viewslast_img

Lavanda raises $5m investment to legitimise Airbnb-style rentals

first_imgLavanda, a technology platform enabling institutional real estate portfolios to profit legitimately from Airbnb-style homestays and homesharing, has secured a $5 million Series-A round led by Henley Ventures. The investment brings Justin Meissel, Henley CIO and MD Europe to Lavanda’s board with Harry Hill, founder of Rightmove, as non-executive director.Lavanda’s SaaS platform provides residential landlords and asset managers with a toolkit to execute high-yielding, hospitality-led short and medium term rental strategies uniformly across both domestic and international portfolios.A key feature of the platform is the flexibility that it offers customers; users can manage operations themselves, or tap into a curated marketplace of best-in-class local management companies operating within the Lavanda ecosystem.10,000 units are managed on the Lavanda platform and customers include some of the world’s best known real estate portfolios and managers – including JLL, Savills and LaSalle,.Justin Meissel, Henley CIO and MD Europe, said, “Lavanda legitimises and institutionalises short and medium-term rental options for commercial landlords, providing a best-in-class tech solution. As owners, operators and developers of over 10,000 residential units, Henley has first-hand exposure to the income uplift potential driven by Lavanda’s model. Henley Ventures is pleased to be supporting Lavanda and their top notch team as their business goes global.”Justin Meissel lananda technology platform Airbnb-style homestays and homesharing Lavanda’s SaaS platform Henley Ventures proptech harry hill November 12, 2019The NegotiatorWhat’s your opinion? Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.Please note: This is a site for professional discussion. Comments will carry your full name and company.This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.Related articles Letting agent fined £11,500 over unlicenced rent-to-rent HMO3rd May 2021 BREAKING: Evictions paperwork must now include ‘breathing space’ scheme details30th April 2021 City dwellers most satisfied with where they live30th April 2021 Home » News » Lavanda raises $5m investment to legitimise Airbnb-style rentals previous nextProptechLavanda raises $5m investment to legitimise Airbnb-style rentalsThe Negotiator12th November 20190207 Viewslast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *